Is CrushOn AI Safe? — Privacy Risks & Security Analysis 2026
Affiliate disclosure: This page contains referral links. Our safety assessment is independent of affiliate relationships.
Last updated: May 2026.
The honest safety summary: CrushOn AI is not malware, but it is not a privacy-safe platform. The Mozilla Foundation's "Privacy Not Included" project — a systematic privacy audit program — assigned CrushOn AI their worst rating: WARNING. That label is not handed out casually. Combined with 45 trackers loading within the first minute of use and extensive health data collection documented in the privacy policy, the privacy picture is genuinely concerning.
This page documents the specific findings so you can make an informed decision.
Safety Overview
| Safety Dimension | Status |
|---|---|
| Malware risk | None reported |
| SSL/TLS encryption (transit) | Yes |
| Encryption at rest | Cannot confirm |
| Data breaches | None reported as of May 2026 |
| Mozilla Privacy Not Included | WARNING (worst label) |
| Trackers on load | 45 (including DoubleClick) |
| Age verification | Self-reported checkbox only |
| Trustpilot rating | 2.1/5 |
What Mozilla Found
The Mozilla Foundation's Privacy Not Included project tests consumer products against defined privacy standards. CrushOn AI received their WARNING label — the worst possible outcome in their rating system.
| Mozilla Finding | Detail |
|---|---|
| Privacy rating | WARNING (worst outcome) |
| Trackers detected in first minute | 45 |
| Known trackers included | Google DoubleClick, others |
| Encryption at rest | Cannot be confirmed |
| Health data in privacy policy | Mentioned 23 times |
| Biometric data collection | Yes (face, keystrokes, voice) |
| User control over data | Limited |
The 45 trackers detected within the first minute of use is an unusually high figure even for ad-supported consumer software. DoubleClick is Google's advertising network — its presence means browsing behavior data can be linked to Google's advertising profile infrastructure.
Data Collection Practices
What CrushOn AI Collects
| Data Category | Collected | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Audio/visual data | Yes | Voice recordings, face images |
| Contact information | Yes | Email address required |
| Device/network data | Yes | IP address, device type |
| Financial data | Yes | Payment information |
| Location data | Yes | Precise location where granted |
| Identity data | Yes | Account profile information |
| Transaction data | Yes | Purchase history |
| Chat content | Yes | Conversation logs |
| Health data | Yes | See below |
| Biometric data | Yes | Face images, keystroke patterns, voice |
How CrushOn AI Uses Your Data
| Use Case | Documented |
|---|---|
| AI model training | Yes |
| Advertising | Yes |
| Commercial purposes (marketing) | Yes |
| Business operations | Yes |
| Social media engagement | Yes |
| Shared with affiliated companies | Yes (Peekaboo Tech Ltd., Inc., Game Ltd.) |
| Shared with third-party vendors | Yes |
| Shared with advertisers | Yes |
Health Data Concerns
The phrase "health data" appears 23 times in CrushOn AI's privacy policy. The categories documented include health conditions, treatments and medications, mental health, physical health, gender-affirming care, and reproductive and sexual health.
| Health Data Category | Referenced in Policy |
|---|---|
| Mental health conditions | Yes |
| Physical health conditions | Yes |
| Medications and treatments | Yes |
| Reproductive and sexual health | Yes |
| Gender-affirming care | Yes |
This data is collected in the context of a chatbot platform — meaning conversations with AI characters may be analyzed for health-related signals and used for commercial and advertising purposes. This is the aspect of the privacy policy that draws the most legitimate concern.
Age Verification
CrushOn AI uses self-reported age verification only — a checkbox confirming you are 18 or older. There is no identity document verification.
| Age Verification Method | Status |
|---|---|
| Self-reported checkbox | Yes |
| ID verification | No |
| Credit card (as age signal) | Partial (required for paid tiers only) |
| Parental controls | None documented |
FindMyKids, a parental monitoring organization, has flagged this as inadequate. The platform hosts disturbing content that is frontloaded in some browsing areas without meaningful age gating.
Trustpilot Review Data
| Trustpilot Metric | Data |
|---|---|
| Overall rating | 2.1/5 stars |
| Total reviews | 14 |
| 1-star reviews | 13 (93% of total) |
| 5-star reviews | 1 |
| Common 1-star complaints | AI "randomly generated nonsense," ignores character specs, poor value |
The small sample size (14 reviews) limits statistical confidence. However, a 93% 1-star rate with consistent complaint themes — AI quality, value, and customer service — represents a meaningful signal.
How to Protect Yourself on CrushOn AI
| Precaution | Benefit |
|---|---|
| Use a burner/alias email | Disconnects account from real identity |
| Use a VPN | Masks IP address and location data |
| Decline third-party sign-in (Google/social) | Prevents cross-platform identity linking |
| Avoid sharing sensitive personal info in chat | Chat content is collected and may train models |
| Disable location tracking | Limits precise location data collection |
| Use strong unique password | Protects against credential stuffing |
| Review app permissions before installing | Limit camera/microphone access |
| Request data deletion when done | ~48 hour manual process via support |
Has CrushOn AI Been Hacked?
No major data breaches have been reported as of May 2026. However, Mozilla's inability to confirm encryption at rest means that stored user data — including chat logs and collected biometric data — may not be fully protected if a breach were to occur.
| Breach History | Status |
|---|---|
| Known breaches | None reported (May 2026) |
| Encryption at rest | Unconfirmed |
| Responsible disclosure policy | Not prominently documented |
Our Safety Verdict
| Verdict Dimension | Assessment |
|---|---|
| Technical safety (malware) | Safe |
| Data privacy | High concern |
| Health data handling | Significant risk |
| Age verification adequacy | Inadequate |
| Trustpilot user experience | Poor (2.1/5) |
| Recommended for privacy-conscious users | No |
CrushOn AI is not unsafe in the sense of malware or immediate security risk. It is, however, a platform that collects more data than necessary, shares it with advertisers and affiliated companies, and has received systematic documentation of its data practices from the Mozilla Foundation.
If you decide to use CrushOn AI, take the precautions listed above. If privacy is a priority, our alternatives comparison covers platforms with better reputations. The platform's free tier allows testing without payment — worth doing before committing to a subscription.
Frequently Asked Questions
CrushOn AI's privacy policy documents sharing data with affiliated companies (Peekaboo Tech Ltd., Inc., Game Ltd.), third-party vendors, and advertisers for commercial purposes. Whether this constitutes "selling" under definitions like CCPA depends on jurisdiction and interpretation. The practical effect — your data being used for advertising and commercial purposes by multiple parties — is documented.
Yes. Account deletion is a manual process that takes approximately 48 hours. Contact support@crushon.ai or use the account deletion option in settings if available. After deletion, request confirmation that your data has been removed per their retention policy.
No. The platform hosts explicit adult content and uses only a self-reported age checkbox as age verification. There is no ID verification and no meaningful parental controls. FindMyKids has specifically flagged CrushOn AI's inadequate age gating as a concern.
Yes. CrushOn AI's privacy policy documents that chat content is used for AI model training. This is common practice across AI chatbot platforms — but worth understanding before sharing anything sensitive in conversation.
No publicly reported breaches as of May 2026. However, Mozilla Foundation could not confirm that data is encrypted at rest, which means stored data would be more vulnerable in a hypothetical breach than it would be if encryption at rest were confirmed. No data collection system is entirely breach-proof — which is why minimizing the personal information you share is the most effective protection.